Nofollow vs dofollow links: what is the difference?
A "dofollow" link is an ordinary link with no rel attribute, so search engines can pass ranking credit through it. A nofollow link carries rel="nofollow", asking search engines not to treat it as an endorsement. Since 2019 Google treats nofollow, and the newer rel="sponsored" and rel="ugc" attributes, as hints rather than strict rules. Paid links should be marked sponsored or nofollow, and nofollow links from the right sites still bring traffic, visibility and brand mentions.
What does each attribute actually tell a search engine?
There is no such thing as a dofollow attribute. "Dofollow" is shorthand for a normal link: <a href="...">. Search engines may follow it and count it as a vote for the destination.
The qualifying attributes tell search engines something about the relationship:
| Attribute | Use it for | What it signals |
|---|---|---|
rel="sponsored" | Ads, paid placements, affiliate links, anything given in exchange for value | "This link was paid for" |
rel="ugc" | User-generated content: comments, forum posts, reviews | "A user added this, not us" |
rel="nofollow" | Any link you do not want to vouch for, where the others do not fit | "Do not treat this as our endorsement" |
You can combine them, for example rel="nofollow sponsored". Google introduced sponsored and ugc in September 2019 and at the same time began treating all three as hints. It may still crawl these links, and it decides for itself whether to use them in ranking.
Why does the distinction matter for your link strategy?
Compliance. Google's spam policies treat buying or selling links that pass ranking credit as link spam. A paid link should be qualified with sponsored or nofollow. Getting this wrong at scale is how sites end up with a manual action in Search Console.
Expectations. Most newswire and press release distribution adds nofollow to outbound links, as do many large news sites and platforms such as Wikipedia, Reddit and most social networks. If you are buying distribution purely for "dofollow links", you are buying the wrong thing.
Value beyond rankings. A nofollow link in a widely read article still sends readers, gets you noticed by journalists who later link editorially, and puts your brand on pages that AI engines read when deciding who to mention. In GEO terms, the mention can matter as much as the link.
How should you decide which links to pursue?
Filter opportunities by these questions, in this order:
- Will your buyers see it? Audience fit first. A link nobody reads is worth little whatever its attribute.
- Is the site relevant and trusted? Sector relevance and editorial standards.
- Is it editorial or paid? Editorial links can be plain links. Paid placements should be qualified, and you should value them for reach and mention rather than ranking credit.
- Only then: what is the attribute? Between two equally good opportunities, a followed editorial link is worth more for rankings. That is a tiebreaker, not a filter.
How do you check a link's attribute?
- Right-click the link on the page and choose Inspect.
- Look at the
<a>tag in the HTML panel. If there is arelattribute containingnofollow,sponsoredorugc, it is qualified. If there is none, it is a plain link. - For a whole site, any backlink tool will show the split across your profile. Note that some sites add
relattributes with JavaScript after load, so the rendered HTML is what counts.
What are the common mistakes?
- Rejecting every nofollow opportunity. You lose coverage on exactly the large publications that build recognition.
- Selling or buying "dofollow" as the product. It trains you to judge links by an attribute instead of by audience and relevance, and it is the pattern Google's link spam policies describe.
- Nofollowing your own internal links. Nofollow on internal links to pages you want indexed only confuses Google. Use it for login pages or nothing at all.
- Chasing a "natural ratio". There is no target percentage of nofollow links. A natural profile has a mix because natural links come from many kinds of site, not because someone engineered it.
What does this look like for a real business?
Here is a hypothetical. Say you run a fintech start-up in DIFC and you announce a new licence. The announcement goes out on a newswire and is picked up on several finance portals, all with nofollow links. A week later, a sector newsletter writes an analysis of licensing trends in the region and links to your announcement with a plain link, because the editor found it via the wire.
The nofollow pickups did not move rankings directly. They did put your news in front of the editor who gave you the followed link, and they put your company name and licence detail on pages AI engines read. Judged only by attribute, the wire would look like a waste; judged by what it caused, it did its job.
How WebBox approaches this
We judge placements by audience, relevance and editorial standards first, and we are upfront about which links are followed and which are not before you commit. PR distribution is planned for coverage and mentions; editorial outreach and contributed articles are where followed links tend to come from. In your link audit we flag any patterns that look like paid links passing ranking credit, so you can deal with them before they become a problem.
Related questions
Something else? Book a call and ask us directly.
